Electoral legislation: limiting freedom of speech or a guarantee of candidates equal rights?
According to some observers, current Ukrainian legislation restrictions the opportunities of the media to provide objective coverage of the presidential election campaign, and it is too late to change this. Nonetheless, the Ukrainian media should be unbiased in its coverage and how to achieve this was the subject of a roundtable in Kyiv on 16 November.
On the eve of the present presidential campaign four draft laws on the presidential elections were tabled in parliament. The one which has come into force does not take into account comments from media representatives and returns electoral legislation on coverage of the elections to the situation n 2004, Head of the Centre for Legislative Initiatives of the Independent Association of Television and Radio Broadcasters, Olha Bolshakova.
“We have legislation which it is virtually impossible to work with. The biggest flaws are that: any material which pertains to the candidates is regarded as pre-election campaigning because there is no differentiation between it and other information. If the media publishes information, they are at risk since parliamentarians voted against such material. Furthermore, the right of a media outlet to refuse to publish dirty advertising has been removed from legislation on the elections.
Deputy Chair of the parliamentary committee on freedom of speech and information, Andriy Shevchenko agrees that such provisions in electoral legislation need to be changed, however he does not believe that such changes will be considered before the elections.
One of the law’s authors, Yury Klyuchkovsky from the bloc “Our Ukraine – People’s Self-Defence” acknowledges that the present law is flawed, however asserts that only through its enforcement can equal conditions be ensured for all candidates.
“According to international standards, any analysis, especially coloured material, is not information. During the elections this is objectively campaigning. The law states that images of a candidate on the screen is campaigning. Together with freedom of speech we forget about another fundamental principle – equality before the law of all candidates. Only the voting day urns will show which candidate is most popular. Everything else is influence on this result, however an unlawful influence.
Professor Giovanne de Maiola from OSCE reminded Ukrainian media representatives of a fundamental principle of European political journalism: publishing critical information about a politician, you must him or her a chance to respond. He adds that in Ukrainian conditions, where some presidential candidates have power and influence on the main media, it is extremely difficult to achieve such objectivity.
From a text at www.radiosvoboda.org
Freedom of speech in presidential hopefuls’ programmes
CVU: electoral shenanigans on the rise but no flagrant pressure on voters
OPORA: civic monitoring of the elections
Even calling somebody a cannibal may not impinge upon the voter
Committee of Voters Presidential Election Campaign Monitoring Report for November
Parliament rejects amendments to the Law on the Presidential Elections
The Media and the Presidential Elections
Ukraine: Statement by the PACE pre-election delegation
OSCE observers begin their mission in Ukraine
Electoral legislation: warnings heeded but risks remain
Amendments to Presidential election law passed at first reading
Constitutional Court finds some provisions of the Law on the Presidential Elections unconstitutional
Committee of Voters concerned over election process
Venice Commission also has serious criticism of the law on the Presidential elections
CVU – New law on elections is a return to Kuchma times
Parliamentarians also dubious about the law on the Presidential Elections
Committee of Voters of Ukraine Monitoring Report
Presidential veto on election law overridden
Yushchenko vetoes amendments to law on Presidential elections