MENU
Documenting
war crimes in Ukraine

The Tribunal for Putin (T4P) global initiative was set up in response to the all-out war launched by Russia against Ukraine in February 2022.

Similar articles

Russia sentences poet Aleksandr Byvshev to 7 years for writing of its war crimes in Ukraine Ukrainian journalist and former editor abducted from Russian-occupied Henichesk Crimean blogger sentenced to 2.5 years for 'showing disrespect for Russia's military glory' The UN Committee on the Rights of the Child condemned violations of the rights of Ukrainian children by the Russian Federation‘I realisied that it's a kilometre to run through unexploded shells to get to the well...’ — Chronicles of occupied Izium‘Ukraine is not Russia’: Judge expresses opposing view over pensioner’s prison sentence for a ‘like’ Referral network. Design and functioningNew attempt to imprison Memorial Head for ‘disrupting civil society’ by condemning Russia’s war against UkraineImprisoned Russian poet Alexander Byvshev charged with ‘calls to terrorism’ for poem condemning Russia’s war against UkraineRussia stages ‘trial’ of young Ukrainians abducted and tortured into ‘confessing’ to terrorism‘The military registration and enlistment office said they didn't need my services’Move to criminalize protest over political and religious persecution in Russia and occupied Ukraine as ‘justification of extremism’Court in Russia imposes massive fine for criticizing Stalin and telling the truth about Soviet collaboration with Nazi GermanyYouTube increasingly blocked in occupied Crimea as Russia intensifies censorship over its war against UkraineDefender of Crimean Tatar political prisoners gets 6 years for posts spelling out Russia's war crimes in UkraineOne step away from death — the story of volunteer Maksym VainerDefender of Crimean Tatar political prisoners faces 7-year sentence for posts against Russia’s war against UkraineUkraine ‘began the war against Russia’ in Moscow’s official school history textbook ‘My three-year-old son says: Putin should be buried in his bunker — then there will be no war’In the shelter, my daughter cared for her toy

The Internet – the first steps to checking your sources of information

10.08.2006   
Part of a seminar prepared by the Institute of Mass Information for journalists investigating stories, this information should be of interest to others as well

Ukrainian legislation pays little attention to the Internet.  Neither de jure, nor de facto, can a publication posted on the Internet be automatically deemed to be reliable.

It is not difficult in practice to create an Internet website and post untruthful information on it. It is by no means always easy to find the person who in this way circulated untruthful information. Codes for accessing the site may also be in the hands of not only those servicing the site.  Potential impunity makes people more daring.

Even on fairly well-established websites information may prove to be unreliable. This is caused by the fact that the process for posting information on the Internet is not especially complicated and does not require the many stages one goes through in publishing something in the press. One needs only a text available in electronic form, the password for making changes on the site, this being known to a fairly large circle of people. It can also happen that a mistake appears in copying information from one site to another, or in translation when only one person is responsible, and the text is not later checked.

The situation is also in principle possible where a fake copy of a real website is created with untruthful information posted on the fake version. Even when typing in the address of the real site, users are directed to the fake.

It is clearly for these reasons that Ukrainian legislation does not view the Internet as a reliable source of information. Among grounds for dismissal of journalists or the media outlet, one can find “repeating verbatim material circulated by another media outlet or information agency, with reference to it”, however Internet sites do not come under the category of media outlets.

The presence of information on the Internet is thus not only “a step to the source” of information, since such information cannot yet be regarded as reliable. Incidentally, the courts are highly sceptical about printouts from the Internet presented as evidence. Judges give much more credence to evidence in the form of witnesses’ testimony, written evident, signed by the author him or herself, other material evidence, not to speak of official documents.

It is another matter when one is dealing with an alleged breach of authors’ rights or when a defamation suit is involved. In such cases the claimant need only prove that the relevant information was circulated on the Internet (i.e. the presence of the information on the Internet makes it clear to the court that it was circulated, although the truth of the information is no way clear). 

As far as checking information is concerned, its presence on several websites increases the likelihood of its reliability, however only on condition that the information is not expressed in identical phrases on different sites (since it is possible that it was simply copied from site to site). It is therefore worth checking the accuracy of information on the Internet with the help of other sources of information. However, from a legal point of view, the weightiest argument will remain only whether information was received from official sources (from the state authorities or bodies of local self-government, and officials of these carrying out their duties).

from a seminar prepared by the Institute of Mass Information: "What journalists need to know when investigating a story" (2006)

The Insti

 Share this